• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Join the IGWG
  • News & Updates

IGWG HomepageIGWG

  • Priority Areas
    • Gender-Based Violence
    • Gender-Based Violence Task Force
    • Male Engagement
    • Male Engagement Task Force
    • Youth and Gender
  • Resources
    • Trainings
    • K4Health Gender and Health Toolkit
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • About the IGWG
    • Our Priority Areas
    • The Gender Integration Continuum
    • Get the Benefits of an IGWG membership
  • News & Updates
  • Join the IGWG
  • Contact

reproductive health

IGWG GBV Task Force Meeting Report: Exploring the Impact of Reproductive Coercion on Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes

Posted on September 30, 2022

On Aug. 31, 2022, the Interagency Gender Working Group’s (IGWG) Gender-Based Violence Task Force hosted “Exploring the Impact of Reproductive Coercion on Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes.” This event focused on the connections between reproductive coercion, intimate partner violence, and domestic violence, as well as highlighting reproductive coercion’s impacts on sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes, particularly in family planning.

The event served as a forum for stakeholder dialogue and featured examples of program and advocacy approaches addressing reproductive coercion that have been successfully integrated into SRH programs. Panelists also shared considerations for funders, particularly around the roles they can play to strengthen commitments to prioritize and address reproductive coercion.

This meeting report shares key takeaways from the event, focusing on program implementation challenges and emerging issues in reproductive coercion, as well as promising practices for addressing reproductive coercion. The report also offers recommendations for program implementers, researchers, and governments, donors, and multi-lateral institutions that emerged from the discussion.

READ THE MEETING REPORT HERE

September Gender Knowledge Exchange Event: Exploring Evaluation and Learning Methods in Community-Led Gender Transformative Programming

Posted on September 9, 2022

Background: The 2022 Interagency Gender Working Group (IGWG) Plenary explored the elements and impacts of community-led, gender transformative programming, a topic that resonated with our members and attendees. The event, which convened more than 200 attendees representing 46 countries, highlighted promising practices and lessons learned for how to ensure meaningful community leadership in gender transformative global health programming.

The discussions that arose during the plenary highlighted the importance of gender champions cultivating effective and equitable learning and evaluation partnerships with community leaders and groups—both formal and informal—to help address common challenges such as limited resources, competing agendas, and ingrained power differences.

Event Recording:

The opinions expressed in this video are those of the presenters and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) or the United States government.

Event Materials:

View slides from the event here.

Event Overview: Building on the momentum of the 2022 Plenary, the IGWG hosted a gender knowledge exchange event on September 7 from 9:00-11:00 a.m. EDT, exploring in more depth one of the plenary’s many thematic areas of interest: participatory and inclusive evaluation and learning methods in community-led, gender transformative programming, particularly family planning, reproductive health, and gender-based violence prevention.

Despite the wide acceptance of the importance of community leadership in theory and practice, many implementation challenges remain, particularly in strengthening programming’s participatory learning and evaluation components. Recent published literature reveals questions about the relationship between degree of participation and impact, how impact should be defined, and the role of wider social forces on the evaluation process for health programs. Additionally, practical process and content questions remain about how to get started implementing participatory learning and evaluation in programs, what steps are necessary to form these processes, how decisions are made, and what outcomes should be monitored.

This gender knowledge exchange provided members with the opportunity for deeper and more informal exchange as participants heard lessons learned from gender champions and experts on these topics in a small-group setting. It began with a panel discussion led by a group of experts, community leaders, and researchers focusing on strategies for and approaches to participatory and inclusive evaluation and learning methods and exploring promising practices for measuring community leadership in gender transformative programming. Following the panel discussion, attendees had the opportunity to participate in a Q&A session with speakers. Panelists included:

  • Nancy Glass, Professor and Independence Foundation Chair, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing
  • Tamil Kendall, Director, Partnership for Women’s Health Research Canada
  • Renu Khanna, Co-Founder and Mentor, Society for Health Alternatives (SAHAJ)
  • Rachel Litoroh, Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability, and Learning Manager, Comitato Internazionale per lo Sviluppo dei Popoli/International Committee for the Development of Peoples (CISP)

Key Takeaways:

How can program implementers engage with community leaders to improve monitoring and learning activities and influence the effectiveness and relevance of gender transformative programs?

  • Program implementers should consult regularly with community members to hear their concerns and feedback and build trust, understanding that the primary role of implementers in these meetings should be to keep a pulse on what is happening in the community and listen to constituents. For example, the SAHAJ program implemented periodic federation meetings where community leaders of each group came together to share issues, lessons learned, and challenges. This feedback was then incorporated into program interventions.
  • In meetings with community leaders, implementers should be open to hearing alternative solutions to challenges and not go into meetings with decisions already made.

How can the role or insights of community leaders in monitoring or evaluation contribute to and affect gender transformative programming’s attention toethical dilemmas and efforts to do no harm?

  • Recruiting peers to lead evaluation interviews may help interviewees feel more comfortable about discussing sensitive or taboo topics. To document SRH violations that women living with HIV were experiencing, the ICW (International Community of Women Living With HIV)-Latina/Balance program recruited peers to document evidence and trained all peer researchers in confidentiality protocol and informed consent.
  • Program implementers should ensure community leaders have decision-making power over program evaluation goals and what data and information are documented. For example, community leaders can co-create questionnaires, helping to decide the language and framing of the questions. Implementers should ensure evaluation tools are communicated in a way that community leaders can understand (in other words, with less jargon), and support community leaders in feeling a sense of ownership over the program data, encouraging them to use the data in their work. Additionally, collaborating with community leaders to develop messaging around program data can foster a sense of joint ownership, which may support leaders’ use of the data in their work and advocacy efforts.
  • Community leaders can help program staff navigate discussions on sensitive topics with community members. For example, before discussing issues related to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) with youth in India—topics that are considered very sensitive and require consent to be discussed with young people—the SAHAJ program created community advisory groups of adults or supporters, progressive parents, teachers, and community leaders to guide the discussions and the ensure they were culturally appropriate and acceptable.
  • Implementers should support the inclusion of marginalized and excluded groups in evaluation and learning processes, recognizing that in some contexts, deep-seeded and intergenerational structures (for example, caste systems) are more difficult to penetrate.

How can community leaders play a role in the evaluations of gender transformative programs?

  • Before developing the program evaluation, implementers should meet with community leaders to discuss expectations for outcomes, what success looks like, and outcome indicators. Similarly, community leaders should be included in discussions for external evaluations. External evaluators should build in spaces to engage with community leaders and provide them with the opportunity to reflect on their work and why it has or has not worked, as well as to encourage leaders to share their stories.
  • Recognizing that community leaders have an important stake in the program evaluation process, implementers should engage leaders (including government officials) early to ensure programs are context-specific and achieve support for program results. For example, after receiving feedback from community leaders and authorities about the exclusion of female genital mutilation in their programming, the Community Care Programme (CCP) incorporated this topic into its interventions and evaluation.
  • Community leaders should help decide how evaluation findings are communicated back to the community, including how the results are shared and with whom. Their participation is especially important for findings on sensitive issues, which may face serious backlash from the community. Involving community and peer leaders can help program implementers frame their findings in a way that provides transparency and avoids setting back the work of gender transformative social norms or creating further risk to impacted groups.
  • Recognizing possible tensions that may arise between supporting organizations and the ability of community leaders to be frank and critical, program implementers should work to build the trust of community leaders to engage in evaluation and learning method processes effectively. Implementers should recognize that criticism from community leaders may be an indicator that they are starting to trust program processes.

What are some practices and methods that programs can apply and use to measure changes in community leadership?

  • To assess changes in growth in community leadership at individual and organizational levels, implementers can build questions into evaluations related to changes in community leaders (and their organizations’) capacity to lead during regular check-ins and progress meetings, as well as capture these changes through formal interviews and participant observations. The ICW/Balance program asked participants about how their views and personal priorities and practices related to SRH, and their organization’s priorities and collective action efforts with other organizations, changed throughout the process and documented these changes. In one example of growth, program participants—women living with HIV—acted as subject matter experts and used program-generated evidence to influence policy and care guidelines at the national level.
  • Stories shared during discussions with community leaders can be a rich way of learning about various forms of leadership, how capacities have changed and evolved, and how subject knowledge of issues has grown. Stories can also provide insight into the experiences of community leaders and marginalized groups, as well as the intersectional experiences of program participants.
  • In addition to using formal tools, program implementers can monitor the behavior of community leaders who are successfully and effectively facilitating discussions on sensitive topics. The CCP monitored how community leaders led discussions on sensitive topics, which helped indicate leaders who were likely to continue these discussions after the end of the program and identified those who could mentor other leaders. The CCP also mapped out reference groups, recognizing that leaders who are most vocal and well-known may not be the only the ones driving change.

Exploring the Impact of Reproductive Coercion on Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes

Posted on September 6, 2022

Background: Reproductive coercion is a form of gender-based violence (GBV) and refers to a range of behaviors that interfere with autonomous decision-making related to contraception and pregnancy. It negatively impacts an individual’s reproductive health and autonomy. Several studies have linked reproductive coercion to intimate partner violence (IPV), unintended pregnancies, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and poor mental health.

Event Recording:

Event Materials:

Read the meeting report here.

Complete event slidedeck.

“Introduction to Reproductive Coercion” presentation slides.

Event Overview: The Interagency Gender Working Group’s (IGWG) GBV Task Force hosted an event on Wednesday, August 31 from 8:00-10:00 a.m. EDT focused on exploring the connections between reproductive coercion in the context of intimate and household relationships, IPV, and domestic violence, as well as highlighting reproductive coercion’s impacts on sexual and reproductive health (SRH), particularly family planning and GBV outcomes.

The event served as a forum for stakeholder dialogue and highlighted examples of program and advocacy approaches addressing reproductive coercion that have been successfully integrated into SRH programs, particularly family planning and GBV. It also shared considerations for funders, particularly around the roles they can play to strengthen commitments to prioritize and address reproductive coercion.

This GBV Task Force event began with a presentation providing an overview on the key elements and examples of reproductive coercion, as well as new findings and trends. A panel of expert implementers and researchers then shared key findings and promising practices from and challenges encountered in their programs. The panel discussion was followed by a Q&A session where attendees had the opportunity to pose questions to speakers. Panelists included:

  • Hannatu Abdullahi, Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Technical Director, Jhpiego, Nigeria
  • Jhumka Gupta (moderator), ScD, MPH, Associate Professor, Department of Global and Community Health, College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University
  • Elizabeth Miller, MD, PhD, FSAHM, Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
  • Jane Harriet Namwebya, Senior Implementation Coordinator, Population Council, Kenya
  • Fura Gelzen Sherpa, Board Member, Youth Peer (Y-PEER) Educational Network, Nepal
  • Jay Silverman, PhD, Professor of Medicine and Global Public Health and Associate Director, Center on Gender Equity and Health (GEH), University of California San Diego School of Medicine

Lessons Learned in Gender Transformative Health Programming: A Rapid Literature Review

Posted on August 3, 2022

In the past two decades, use of the term gender transformative by policymakers, donors, implementing agencies, and civil society actors has increased dramatically. Many health donors, bilateral and global institutions, and implementing agencies have endorsed their commitment to realizing gender transformative programs, although the definitions used by global health institutions vary.

At the same time, research on the effectiveness of gender transformative health programs as it relates to health and gender equality outcomes has increased in the past two decades. As implementers and researchers use the term gender transformative as evaluative criteria for gender equality programs, with expanding evaluation data and evidence, the need for a clear understanding of what meets the definition becomes increasingly important.

At the 20-year anniversary of the Gender Integration Continuum, the Interagency Gender Working Group has developed a research brief addressing the following questions:

  • How effective is gender transformative programming?
  • What program elements are key to successful programs?
  • What questions or limitations have emerged about the implementation of gender transformative programs?
  • What lessons and conclusions can we take away from programming that aims to change gender and social norms, advance gender equality, and sustain improvements in health?

This research brief summarizes the methods, findings, and conclusions of a rapid literature review of systematic reviews of evaluated gender transformative health programs. It sheds light on how best to achieve gender equality and health outcomes through gender transformative programming. The brief also provides recommendations for program implementers, policy advocates, and funders for improving the effectiveness and sustainability of gender transformative health programs.

Read the Research Brief Here

Webinar: Using Storytelling and Participatory Media to Support Gender Equality and Reproductive Health Outcomes

Posted on October 3, 2017

The Interagency Gender Working Group with StoryCenter Presents

Webinar: Using Storytelling and Participatory Media to Support Gender Equality and Reproductive Health Outcomes

Tuesday, October 17, 2017

For the past 15 years, StoryCenter’s Silence Speaks initiative has developed and refined unique methods for surfacing powerful, first-person stories and positions them as tools for education and training, community mobilization, and policy advocacy for improved reproductive health and gender equality.

This webinar explored the use of project case-studies to illustrate how storytelling can be used in the family planning and reproductive health (FP/RH) context to engage local community members as storytellers and advocates; challenge unhealthy gender norms; and promote the adoption of healthy, gender equitable behaviors and policies.

This webinar helped participants:

  • Describe key elements of a successful, community-based model integrating personal storytelling and participatory media;
  • Understand how this model can encourage dialogue around gender-issues that influence FP/RH outcomes such as gender-based violence, engaging men, and supporting individuals and couples to make and carry out their reproductive intentions;
  • Identify how sharing stories at different levels of the social-ecological model for public health can effect change; and
  • Learn about key steps and resources required to develop effective storytelling and participatory media projects.

 

Thank you for attending!

Footer

Learn More

  • Male Engagement Task Force
  • Gender-based Violence Task Force
  • About the IGWG
  • Contact Us
  • Photo Credits

Follow us:

Join the IGWG

We send out two to three newsletters per week to over 2,600 members interested in the IGWG and other gender-related news.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Gender Continuum

Feedback Form
  • If you are comfortable doing so, please share your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.